Tag: church (Page 1 of 36)

The Chaplaincy Trap

June 3, 2026 / / 0 Comments


The Outward Turn  ·  Part One

If your church ceased to exist tomorrow, would anyone outside your congregation know it was gone?

Sit with that question for a moment before you answer it.

Not the people on your roster. Not the families who would miss Sunday morning. Not the pastor whose livelihood depends on the doors staying open. I mean the neighbors. The apartment complex two blocks away. The single mom who drives past your building every morning on her way to work. The young couple who moved into the neighborhood last year and has no idea your church exists. The business owner on the corner whose employees walk past your parking lot every day.

Would any of them notice?

For most congregations in America, and I say this not to wound but to wake, the honest answer is no. And that’s not a condemnation of the people in those churches. Most of them are good, faithful, loving people who genuinely believe in what they’re doing. But somewhere along the way, without a single dramatic decision, without anyone choosing it on purpose, the church turned inward. And it stayed there.

That’s the chaplaincy trap. And it’s far more common, far more subtle, and far more dangerous than most church leaders are willing to admit.

How It Happens: Comfort to Competency to Identity

Nobody decides to become a chaplaincy church. It doesn’t show up on a vision statement. No board votes to stop caring about the community outside their walls. It happens incrementally, organically, almost invisibly. And it follows a remarkably consistent pattern.

It starts with comfort. A congregation naturally gravitates toward the things its people enjoy, the programs that feel meaningful, the worship style that resonates, the community events that draw a crowd from within. That’s not inherently wrong. A church should be a place where people are genuinely nourished.

But comfort, left unchecked, slides into competency. We get good at the things we do repeatedly. The choir sounds great. The Sunday school runs smoothly. The potluck is legendary. The small groups are warm and connected. These are genuine goods. But they’re all goods that serve the people already in the room.

And then, and this is the critical moment, that competency hardens into identity. What we do becomes who we are. The choir isn’t just a ministry anymore; it’s the soul of this congregation. The Sunday school isn’t just a program; it’s our heritage. And at that point, any suggestion of change doesn’t feel like a strategic conversation. It feels like an existential threat.

The drift is complete. The church now exists, functionally, to sustain itself. The budget reflects it. The calendar reflects it. The staff structure reflects it. And the community outside the walls? They have no idea the church is there because the church has no idea they exist either.

The chaplaincy trap isn’t about bad people. It’s about good people who stopped asking the most important question: who are we here for?

What It Looks Like in Practice

Pull out your church’s budget from last year. Not the vision statement on the wall the actual budget, where the actual dollars went. Ask yourself one question as you read through it:

How much of this spending is oriented toward people who are not yet in this room?

In most congregations, the honest answer is somewhere between five and fifteen percent. Everything else – staff, facilities, programs, insurance, utilities, equipment – serves the people already gathered. That’s not automatically wrong. But if nearly every dollar is pointed inward, the budget is telling you something the vision statement is not.

Now look at the calendar. Count the events from the last twelve months. Sort them into two columns: events designed primarily for the congregation, and events designed primarily to reach, serve, or welcome people who aren’t part of your church. In most congregations, the second column is nearly empty or at best populated with things like a trunk-or-treat that technically invites the community but is really designed to make insiders feel like they’re doing outreach.

Now look at your staff or volunteer leadership structure. Who has a defined role oriented specifically toward people outside the walls.  Not just hospitality to Sunday morning visitors, but intentional, sustained engagement with the surrounding community? For most churches, the answer is no one.

Budget. Calendar. Staff. These three things tell you more about a church’s actual priorities than any vision statement ever written. And in a chaplaincy church, all three point the same direction: inward.

The Theological Problem Underneath the Practical One

Here’s where I need to say something that goes beyond strategy and budgets, because the chaplaincy trap is not just a leadership failure. It is a theological one.

The church was not gathered by Christ in order to maintain itself. It was gathered in order to be sent. The Great Commission is not an addendum to the Christian life. It is its central organizing principle. The verb “go” is the first word of the gospel commission. Not “gather.” Not “sustain.” Go.

When a congregation loses its outward orientation, it doesn’t just become less effective. It becomes something subtly different from what Jesus intended the church to be. A community that exists primarily to serve its own members is a club, not a church. No matter how sincerely it worships, how soundly it preaches, how warmly it fellowships.

The Apostle Paul’s image of the body in 1 Corinthians 12 is instructive here. Every part exists for the sake of the whole. And the whole exists for the sake of the world. A body that turns all its energy inward, that consumes its own resources on its own comfort, is not healthy. It is ill. And the illness, if untreated, is fatal.

A body that consumes all its energy on its own comfort isn’t thriving. It’s sick. And a congregation that exists primarily for itself has quietly traded the Great Commission for a much smaller story.

The Way Out Is Not a Program. It’s a Posture.

If you’re reading this and feeling the weight of recognition. If some part of you is thinking yes, this is us, and I don’t know how we got here…I want to offer something more useful than guilt.

The way out of the chaplaincy trap is not a new outreach program. It’s not a rebranding effort, a new series, or a community event. Those things can be useful, but they treat the symptom rather than the disease. What actually changes a chaplaincy church is a shift in posture. It’s a fundamental reorientation of how the congregation understands its own existence.

That shift starts not with programs but with proximity. It starts with leaders. No, not just pastors, but elders, deacons, ministry chairs, and committed lay people. It’s leaders choosing to spend intentional time in the community they say they want to reach. Not with an agenda. Not with a tract. Just present. Learning names. Understanding needs. Asking questions instead of offering answers.

It starts with a budget conversation that asks not just “what do we need to sustain our ministries” but “what would we need to fund if we were serious about the people outside this building?” That conversation will be uncomfortable. It should be.

It starts with a calendar that has white space on it. Space not filled with another congregational event, but held open for something that doesn’t exist yet. New ministry rarely gets started because there’s a perfect opportunity. It gets started because someone decided to make room for it before they knew what it would become.

And it starts with the question we opened with. Asked not once, but regularly. Asked in board meetings. Asked in budget reviews. Asked in staff conversations and small group discussions.

If we ceased to exist tomorrow, would anyone outside this room know we were gone?

If the answer is no, or even maybe, that’s not a verdict. It’s your invitation.

Leader Assessment

These questions are designed to be answered in two stages. Sit with the personal questions alone first. Honest self-assessment is the foundation of honest leadership.

Sit With These Alone First

When was the last time I had a meaningful conversation with someone in my community who has no connection to my church – not to recruit them, but simply to know them?

If I’m honest, do I spend more of my leadership energy sustaining what exists or creating space for what doesn’t yet exist?

What would I have to give up personally to lead the church toward a more outward posture? Am I willing to pay that cost?

Bring These to Your Leadership

Pull out last year’s budget and calendar. What percentage of our spending and programming was oriented toward people not yet in this congregation? What does that number tell us?

Ask the question plainly: If our church ceased to exist tomorrow, would anyone outside this congregation notice? What would need to change for the answer to become an unambiguous yes?

Name one specific neighborhood, demographic, or community within two miles of this building that has no meaningful connection to our church. What would it cost us in time, money, and energy to begin building one?

Next in this series: the case for merging, consolidating, and going multisite not as institutional strategy, but as the most faithful thing a dying congregation and a growing one can do for each other.

You Keep Going Back to the Wrong Well

June 1, 2026 / / 0 Comments

Why the thing you’re drinking from isn’t satisfying the thirst you actually have

We have a spring on the back of our property.

It’s not dramatic. Just a wet spot on a hill that never dries out. Even in July when everything else is cracked and brown. Even in the winters when the temperature drops to 30 below windchill and the ground pops and cracks from the freeze. That spring keeps trickling no matter the conditions around it.

My son found that out the hard way a few years ago. He was home from the military, decided to take the four-wheeler out on the field. Looked frozen solid from a distance. But it wasn’t. He hit the spring at full speed and the four-wheeler went in eight inches deep into soft mud. In December. In a frozen field.

It took a truck and a tow strap to get it out. And if memory serves me correctly there’s a boot still under the ground somewhere back there.

A spring doesn’t stop flowing just because everything around it looks frozen.

I’ve been thinking about that image a lot recently.

The Thing You’re Thirsty For

What are you thirsty for? What’s the thing you believe will finally make everything better? The relationship you want fixed. The diagnosis you want reversed. The extra zero in the bank account. The new job because you can’t stand the current one. The season of life you keep waiting to arrive so you can finally feel settled.

We spend enormous energy chasing things we believe will satisfy that feeling. And most of them do for a while. And then the feeling comes back. And we go looking again.

We keep going back to the same wells. Not because we’re irrational. Because we’re thirsty. And thirsty people drink whatever is close.

There’s a story in John 4 about a woman who came to a well alone in the middle of the day. Not in the morning with everyone else. Midday. Alone. The detail matters because women in that culture came to the well together in the morning. It was kind of a social ritual. Coming alone in the heat of the afternoon tells you something about her standing in the community. She was avoiding people.

Jesus meets her there and eventually the conversation gets honest. She’d had five husbands. The man she was currently living with wasn’t her husband. And Jesus doesn’t shame her for any of it. He says: you’ve been trying to fill your thirst from relationships. And none of them have worked.

Because they were never designed to.

The Ceremony That Had to Be Repeated

In John chapter 7, Jesus shows up at the Feast of Tabernacles. This was an eight-day festival where, among other things, the priest came down from the Temple Mount every day with a golden pitcher, walked to the Pool of Siloam, drew water, walked back, and poured it at the altar. A picture of how God had provided for his people. A beautiful, meaningful ritual.

That had to be done again every single day of this festival. And every year.

Because it was pointing at something. Not completing something.

On the last great day of the feast, after the priest had poured water seven times. Jesus stood up in the middle of the ceremony and shouted:

“If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.” 
John 7:37–38

He’s not criticizing the ceremony. He’s completing it. He’s saying: all of this stuff – the pitcher, the water, the annual return to the same ritual – it was pointing at me. I’m the thing you’ve been rehearsing.

A Spring, Not a Reservoir

Here’s what I find interesting about the specific image Jesus uses. He doesn’t say he’ll give you a tank full of water. He doesn’t say a reservoir. He says rivers, plural rivers, flowing from inside you.

A reservoir runs dry if you don’t refill it. A spring flows from a source you didn’t create and can’t control. It keeps going because it’s connected to something deeper than the surface.

That’s what Jesus is offering. Not a one-time fill-up. Not a spiritual top-off when things get low. A spring inside you that keeps flowing because the source is him, not your circumstances.

A spring doesn’t stop flowing when the ground freezes. That’s the point of a spring.

Whatever dry season you’re in right now…the diagnosis, the season of loneliness, the job that’s going nowhere, the relationship that’s harder than you thought it would be…the spring doesn’t care what the surface looks like.

What This Means This Summer

Summer has a way of making us think that if we just do enough things, we’ll feel full. Vacations, experiences, events, time with people. All of it good. None of it able to do what we secretly hope it will.

You’ll come back from the lake trip still carrying the thing you carried in. The ache doesn’t take vacations.

The invitation from John 7 is not complicated. If you’re thirsty and you probably are for something, then come to the right well. Not the one you’ve been going back to out of habit or desperation. The one that doesn’t run dry.

Your greatest longing isn’t for water from a river. It’s for the Spirit from the Father.

That’s the claim Jesus makes. And it’s either the most important thing you’ll hear this year or it’s not true. There isn’t much middle ground.

What well have you been going back to? And is it working?

The Institution Is Not the Church

May 26, 2026 / / 1 Comment

A hard reckoning about numbers, urban deserts, and what it means when a denomination forgets the difference between preserving a structure and advancing a kingdom.

Last week I wrote about the sale of Concordia Ann Arbor and I asked a hard question about what it reveals when a denomination puts a price tag on a Gospel witness in a growing region. The response was significant. More than I expected, honestly. And that reaction itself told me something.

People are not just grieving a university. They are grieving something larger. Something they can feel but struggle to name. The sense that the institution they love is slowly becoming something other than what it was built to be. That the people in charge of it are speaking a language of stewardship and discernment that no longer quite corresponds to the language of the Great Commission.

So let’s go deeper. And let’s be honest about what the numbers actually say.

The Numbers Don’t Lie. They Just Get Ignored.

The LCMS peaked in membership in 1971 at roughly 2.88 million baptized members. As of 2024, that number stands near 1.7 million. That is a loss of over a million people. More than a third of the body in just fifty years.

But the membership number understates the problem. Weekly attendance tells a sharper story. Between 2010 and 2020, average weekly worship attendance was declining at roughly 3.35% per year. After COVID, that rate nearly doubled to 7.85% per year between 2020 and 2023. If you do your own math on this one, you can see this could potentially yield just 50,000 average weekly worshippers sometime between 2070 and 2080. At that point, the denomination will have ceased to function in any meaningful institutional sense for a long time already.

Just let that sink in for a moment. Not as a cause for despair but as a cause for honesty.

And here’s the number that should stop us cold: 45% of LCMS congregations now have average weekly attendance under 50 people. Nearly half of our churches are gatherings smaller than a high school classroom. These are not thriving mission outposts. Most of them are in managed decline, serving aging congregations, waiting on a future that isn’t coming on its own.

Meanwhile, in the Ohio District where I currently serve, baptized membership has declined from roughly 70,000 (back in the day) to approximately 54,576. That’s a loss of more than 20% even as Ohio’s population has grown and shifted toward urban and suburban centers where LCMS presence ranges from thin to invisible.

We are closing more churches than we are opening. And the churches we are opening are largely in communities that already have Lutheran options. The urban core, the very places Jesus walked into, we have largely left.

The Urban Desert in Our Own Backyard

Drive through Columbus. Drive through Cleveland. Drive through Cincinnati. Look at Detroit or pretty much any other inner city option. Then pull up the LCMS church locator and tell me what you see.

You will find Lutheran churches in the suburbs. In the exurbs. In the small towns where German immigrants settled a century ago and their grandchildren’s grandchildren are aging out of the pews. You will find Lutheran schools serving mostly families who are already Lutheran. You will find sturdy, committed congregations doing their best with what they have.

What you will not find, or rarely find, is an intentional, well-resourced, mission-focused LCMS presence in the neighborhoods where the city is actually alive. Where young people are moving. Where immigrants are building new communities. Where the spiritual hunger is real and the Gospel infrastructure is nearly absent.

The Ohio District has approximately 154 congregations, down from roughly 170 just a few years ago. The state of Ohio has 11.8 million people. The math on Gospel presence per capita is not inspiring and it gets worse when you factor in that most of those 154 congregations are not positioned anywhere near the population density that is growing.

The Ohio District’s own website has a dedicated page for church closure information. That page exists because it gets used. Regularly. Four to five closures a year in some districts. Friends that’s not an anomaly, it’s a pattern. That’s a denomination managing retreat, not advancing mission.

We Are Not the First to Face This. But We Might Be the Last to Admit It.

I want to be fair here. The trends hitting the LCMS are not unique to us. Across all Protestant denominations in America, more churches are closing than opening. Weekly church attendance in the U.S. has dropped from 42% of Americans to 30% in recent decades. The secular tide is real. Demographics are real. The cultural headwinds against institutional Christianity are real.

But “everyone is struggling” is not a strategy. It is a sedative.

The question is not whether the environment is hard. It obviously is. The question is whether our response to that environment reflects the mission we were given, or whether it reflects the priorities of an institution trying to survive on its own terms.

And here is where I have to say something uncomfortable.

When a denomination is simultaneously closing schools and churches at an accelerating rate, losing a third of its members over fifty years, watching its urban footprint evaporate, and spending significant resources on legal battles with its own universities, internal governance restructuring, and asset liquidation and the primary public narrative from leadership is about “faithful stewardship” and “prayerful discernment” something is wrong. Not with the people in the pews. Not necessarily even with the pastors in the pulpits. But with the institutional priorities of those who are steering the ship.

You cannot tell me an institution is healthy when it has a dedicated committee to help churches close, a declining count of congregations year over year, and growing urban regions with nearly no intentional Gospel presence. That is not stewardship. That is hospice.

Jesus Is Lord of the Church. That Is Not the Same as “Jesus Will Save Our Institution.”

Here is the theological core of all of this, and I want to say it carefully. The point is not to be provocative. This is true and important and pastors need to say it out loud.

Jesus Christ is Lord of the Church. The Body of Christ, you know the living, breathing, Spirit-indwelt community of believers across every nation and tribe and tongue is indestructible. The gates of hell will not prevail against it. Christ promised. And Christ keeps his promises.

But…He did not promise to preserve the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod.

He did not promise to preserve any institution, any denomination, any particular governance structure, any set of buildings, or any administrative apparatus. History is littered with denominations that once thrived and now are footnotes. The Church of Jesus Christ absorbed them and moved on. It will do the same with ours if we are not careful.

And here is the danger: when we confuse the institution with the Church, we start to make decisions that serve the institution at the expense of the mission. We consolidate campuses not to serve the Gospel but to service debt. We close urban congregations not because the mission is finished but because the building costs too much and the congregation is too small to sustain the budget. We fight legal battles over institutional control while the neighborhoods outside our offices grow more desperate for the one thing we are supposedly in business to give away.

Institutional idolatry doesn’t look like bowing to a golden calf. It looks like choosing institutional survival over missional risk. It looks like protecting assets instead of planting flags. It looks like a denomination so focused on what it is that it forgets what it is for.

What Faithful Stewardship Actually Looks Like

I am not calling for abandoning structure. Confessional Lutheranism has a theology, a liturgy, and a polity worth preserving. Order matters. Doctrine matters. The confessions matter. I believe this deeply.

But stewardship of a confessional tradition is not the same as institutionalism. True stewardship asks: what does this tradition have to give to the world? And where does the world most need what we have?

The answer to that second question is not “in the same suburbs where we’ve always been.” It is in the cities. In the neighborhoods where the Gospel is most absent. It is among the immigrants, the young adults, the working poor, the spiritually hungry people who would never walk into a Lutheran church because they have no idea what Lutheran means and no one has ever come to find them.

Luther himself was a reformer. That means he was someone who looked at a church that had become fat on its own structures and said: this is not what the Gospel requires. His courage was not primarily institutional. It was theological. It was missional. He nailed something to a door and trusted God with the outcome.

We need some of that energy right now. Not recklessness. Not the abandonment of what is true and good. But the willingness to say: if the structure is not serving the mission, the structure needs to change. Even if changing it is costly, even if it upsets people, even if it requires admitting we have been protecting the wrong things.

The Questions That Deserve a Public Answer

I will close with this. I am a pastor in the LCMS. I love this church body. I believe in Lutheran theology. I am raising families in these pews. I am baptizing people, preaching the Word, and building the kind of community I believe the Scriptures describe.

I want the institution I serve to be worthy of the mission I have been given. And right now, I need answers to some questions that are not being asked loudly enough:

What is our concrete, measurable plan for urban mission in the LCMS over the next ten years?

How many new church plants have we started in the last five years, and how does that compare to closures in the same period?

Where is the money from liquidated assets going? Is any of it being deployed into high-need, low-presence mission fields?

When we talk about “faithful stewardship,” are we measuring faithfulness by the mission of Christ, or by the solvency of the institution?

These are not hostile questions. They are the questions a church body that takes its mandate seriously should be asking in public, with transparency, and with the humility to admit that the current trajectory is not good enough.

Jesus is Lord of the Church. That means he is not impressed by our organizational charts, our endowment balances, or our carefully worded governance resolutions. He is looking for people who will go. Who will cross the street. Who will plant a church in a neighborhood where no one asked for one. Who will spend the inheritance, not bury it.

The institution does not need to be preserved. The mission needs to be pursued. Those two things are not always the same, and right now, in the LCMS, I’m not sure we know the difference.

God help us to learn it before it’s too late to matter.

The Table That Was Closed Is Open

May 18, 2026 / / 0 Comments

Why the hunger you can’t name might be the most important thing about you

There is a hunger that doesn’t have a name.

You know the one. It’s not the hunger you feel at noon when you skipped breakfast. It’s deeper than that. It’s that low-grade ache, that sense that something is missing. It’s the feeling of incompleteness you can’t quite locate or explain.

Some of you have felt it in a quiet moment when everything in your life is going well, nothing is wrong, and yet there it is. That restlessness. That vague sense that you were made for something you haven’t quite found yet.

C.S. Lewis said something about this that I keep coming back to. He said: if you find in yourself a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that you were made for another world. That’s not depression. That’s not dysfunction. That’s the imprint of your origin.

Sunday’s sermon was about what that hunger is for. And where it leads.

The Original Table

To get there, I had to start at the beginning. In Genesis, God made a garden. In the middle of that garden he put a tree. It was called the tree of life. And eating from it meant something very specific: ongoing access to life itself. Not a one-time transaction. A daily returning to the source.

The design was that humanity would live in that garden, near that tree, in an ongoing relationship with the God who put it there. Not religion. Not performance. Relationship.

And then something went wrong. They chose the other tree. And God, in one of the most tender and painful moments in all of Scripture, sent them out. He put angels with a flaming sword to guard the way back. The table was closed. Not forever. But it was closed.

And the hunger that had always been designed to be fed at that tree suddenly had nowhere to go.

What the Manna Couldn’t Do

Centuries later, Israel is wandering in the wilderness. They’re hungry. And God provides. Every morning, six days a week, bread from heaven covers the ground. The people call it manna. Literally saying what is it?

It was real. It was grace. God fed a nation in a desert for forty years. That is not nothing.

But it wasn’t the tree of life. Every morning the hunger came back. The manna could sustain life for the day. It could not give back what had been lost in the garden.

Daily provision is not the same as permanent restoration.

This matters for us. Because most of what we reach for to feed the unnamed hunger is some version of manna. Real. Good, even. But temporary. The career, the relationship, the achievement, the milestone. They satisfy for a season. And then the hunger comes back. And we wonder what’s wrong with us.

Nothing is wrong with you. You were designed for something the manna can’t give.

The Wrong Question

In the passage, the crowd that has followed Jesus is pushing back. They want a task list. They say: “what must we do to be doing the works of God?” Give us the religious performance. Tell us how to earn this.

And Jesus collapses the whole task list into one word: believe. Not perform. Believe.

This makes most people uncomfortable – myself included, honestly. Because a task list gives you control. If I perform well enough, I have leverage. Belief requires surrender. It means letting go of the idea that you can make yourself worthy of what’s on the table.

Most of us secretly prefer the task list. But belief is the only door there is.

Eating Once vs. Eating Again

Here’s the part of Sunday’s message that I couldn’t stop thinking about. There’s a verb shift in John 6 that most English translations completely flatten. And it changes everything.

When Jesus first talks about eating his flesh, he uses the Greek word phago. It’s the standard word for eating. Often used for a one-time act. The ancestors ate the manna. Phago. Past tense, done.

But starting in verse 54, he switches to a different word: trogo. It means to gnaw, to chew, to feed with deliberate enjoyment. And it appears as a present participle, which in Greek means: continuously, habitually, repeatedly.

The one who keeps eating. Not the one who ate once. The one who keeps coming back.

This is the contrast Jesus builds in verse 58: your ancestors ate the manna (phago – once, past, done) and they died. Whoever continuously eats this bread (trogo – ongoing, habitual, returning) will live forever.

He is not offering a single decisive bite that locks in eternal life like a cosmic transaction.He is offering a person. A relationship. A continuous, returning, ongoing feeding from the one who is himself the source of life.

The tree of life in the garden operated on one-time logic. One bite. Permanent consequence. That’s why God had to prevent it.

Jesus offers something better than the tree of life ever did. He offers himself. And you don’t eat once and stop being hungry. You come back. You come back again. That is what you were made for.

The Door That Cannot Close

Here is the part I wanted to say slowly.

In verse 37, Jesus says something I had to sit with. “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.”

That phrase, I will never cast out, is ou me ekbalo in Greek. It is a double negative. Which means it is the strongest negation the Greek language is capable of producing. Not unlikely. Not rarely. Categorically impossible.

I will absolutely never, under any circumstances, for any reason, cast out anyone who comes to me.

The cherubim guarded the way back to the tree of life. The sword was real. The barrier was real. For a long time, that table was closed.

But the table is open now. And the door cannot be shut against anyone who comes to it.

That is for the person who drove to the parking lot and couldn’t make themselves walk in. For the person reading this who thinks they’ve done too much, been away too long, wandered too far. For the person carrying something they haven’t told anyone and think disqualifies them from what God is offering.

Ou me ekbalo. The strongest negation available. Nothing you have done can undo what he did.

Keep Coming Back

Here’s the landing.

In the beginning, God set a table. A tree in the middle of a garden. Ongoing access to the source of life. Humanity and God together, eating, abiding, living.

The table was closed. The sword went up. And for a long time there was provision, real provision, but not restoration. Not the full return.

And then Jesus comes. And he says: I am the bread of life. I am what the tree was pointing toward. I am the source, in person, in the flesh, inviting you to come and keep coming.

And then he goes to a cross. And the cross is where the sword falls. It falls on him. Everything that made the table inaccessible, every weight of the brokenness that barred the way back, came down on the one who is himself the bread of life.

He was broken so you could be fed.

When Peter is asked if he’s leaving with the crowd that walks away, he says: Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.

That is honest faith. Not: I have it figured out. Not: I’ve resolved all my questions. Just: there is nowhere else to go. And I know it.

That’s the trogo posture. Not one decisive moment. A life of returning. Again and again, because you know where the source is and you know there is no substitute for it.

The table is open. Whatever you’re carrying, come to it.

You Were Never Meant to Carry It All

May 12, 2026 / / 0 Comments

There’s a strange tension that nobody really prepares you for when the thing you’re leading grows past what you can personally hold.

For a pastor, it’s the congregation. For a manager, it’s the team. For a parent, it might just be the family table getting louder and more complicated. But the tension is the same: at some point, the people under your care outnumber your personal bandwidth and something has to give.

I’m going to talk about this from where I live, which is pastoral ministry. But I’d be surprised if this doesn’t land somewhere closer to home for you too.

At 100 people, you can know pretty much everyone. And no just their names. You know their stories. You know whose kid is struggling in school, who just lost a parent, who is quietly carrying a diagnosis they haven’t told many people yet. You show up in hospital rooms and it feels personal because it is personal. The weight is real, but it’s also relational in a way that is deeply human.

Then somewhere along the way, the number grows.

150…175…200…

And something subtly shifts.

You still know names. You still recognize faces. You still show up in the hospital rooms and sit in the living rooms and pray at the bedsides. I remember walking into the nursing home room for the first time in a couple of months. The elders had been doing these visits and when I walked in I felt like there was a part of the story I was missing. It’s a hard tension to wrestle with. But the illusion that you can personally carry everyone in the same way quietly disappears. Not because you care less. Not because you’re less faithful. But because you are now human in a system that has outgrown individual capacity.

That’s the part nobody likes to say out loud.

Because people assume more growth just means more ministry success. And in one sense, it is. More people hearing the message. More families connected. More lives being formed in community. That matters deeply.

But growth also introduces a kind of pastoral ache. At 100, you shepherd people closely. At 200, you begin to shepherd systems that shepherd people. And that transition is not clean. It feels like loss even when it’s healthy.

You start to realize you can no longer be the primary caregiver for every need. You can’t be the first responder to every crisis. You can’t sit in every hospital room, attend every meeting, or personally track every story with the same depth.

And if you try, something breaks. And that something is usually you.

This is where a lot of leaders get stuck. Because the instinct is to fight the loss of intimacy by working harder. More visits. More hours. More personal coverage. But that math doesn’t scale. It eventually collapses under its own weight. You become the greatest limiting factor to the spread of what you’re actually trying to build.

The harder truth is this: healthy churches don’t grow past the shepherd’s capacity. They grow into shared shepherding.

That’s where elders matter. That’s where lay leaders matter. That’s where growth groups stop being a program and start becoming the real pastoral backbone of the church. Not because the pastor is stepping away, but because the pastor was never meant to carry it all alone in the first place.

Entrusting this kind of relational capital to someone else is hard, even if it’s a very qualified and gifted elder. It feels like you’re abandoning someone when in reality you’re giving them a level of care you can’t give them. And you’re enlarging their circle of people who show care for them at the same time. 

The New Testament doesn’t describe a solo shepherd model. It describes a body. A shared responsibility. A distributed care network where the “one another” commands actually become how people are known, prayed for, and carried.

But even knowing that doesn’t remove the tension.

Because there are still names. Still faces. Still stories you wish you had more bandwidth to sit with. There are still funerals where you wish you had more conversations before the loss. Still hospital rooms where you wish you weren’t walking in as one of many voices, but as the voice they know best.

And yet the call remains.

Faithfulness doesn’t always look like depth with every individual. Sometimes it looks like building a structure where depth can still exist even when you can’t personally provide all of it. That’s the shift. Not from care to no care. But from personal care alone to shared pastoral care multiplied through others.

And if we’re honest, that takes a kind of humility that leadership doesn’t always naturally produce. Because it means releasing the illusion that presence equals exclusivity. It means trusting others with stories you wish you could hold more closely yourself. It means believing that the Spirit of God is not confined to your schedule or your proximity.

There’s no clean ending to this tension. No neat resolution where everything feels balanced and satisfying.

There’s just the ongoing work of showing up, staying faithful, raising up others, and learning to accept that shepherding more people will always mean carrying things you cannot personally carry at the same depth you once did.

And maybe that’s the point. Not to replicate 100-person care at 200. But to build a church where 200 people are actually being shepherded…just not by one person alone.

That’s the hard part.

And also, the necessary one.

Stewardship Means Structure (Part 2): The Final 3 Moves We Can’t Ignore

May 6, 2026 / / 0 Comments

If we’re going to stop managing decline and actually start stewarding the mission, then we have to finish what we started.

The first three moves were about people, partnership, and process.

These final three are about focus, funding, and fruit.

And if we miss these, we’ll keep spinning our wheels no matter how many conversations we have.

4. Activate Synod and District Resources (Beyond Just Two Lanes)

If we’re being honest, maybe even a little optimistically honest, we have to admit that at best we’ve put most of our energy into two categories:

  • Church planting
  • Church revitalization

Both matter. Both are needed. But they are not the whole picture.

There are dozens of congregations sitting in the middle:

  • Not healthy enough to plant
  • Not dying fast enough to trigger revitalization
  • But absolutely in need of intentional direction and support

And too often… they get neither.

What If We Broadened the Strategy?

What if we leveraged existing district and synod resources to:

  • Strengthen already healthy, growing churches so they can multiply impact
  • Support partnership models between congregations
  • Guide mergers, adoptions, and multi-site expressions
  • Help churches reimagine facility usage and community engagement

Not everything fits neatly into “plant” or “revitalize.” And if that’s all we fund, that’s all we’ll get.

Let’s Be Clear About What This Is (and Is Not)

This is not about:

  • Traditional vs. contemporary worship
  • Liturgical vs. non-liturgical styles
  • Personal preferences or ministry flavor

This is about viability:

  • Financial sustainability
  • Leadership capacity
  • Property stewardship
  • Missional effectiveness

Those are the real issues that need to be addressed.

And One More Thing We Need to Say Out Loud

Yes, Jesus is Lord of the Church. Absolutely. That is not a question at all.

But that doesn’t mean every local expression of the Church will remain open forever. Perhaps a better way to look at it is the difference between Church and local congregations.

The Church remains forever, but congregations have closed before. And they will close again.

Not because Jesus failed, but because missions shift, communities change, and stewardship matters.

Faithfulness is not measured by how long a building stays open. It’s measured by whether we’re aligned with the mission of making disciples.

5. Fund Strategy, Not Just Survival

We need to rethink how we use money. Because right now, too often, funding decisions are driven by one question:

“How do we help this congregation stay open a little longer?”

That’s not strategy. That’s delay. What if we asked instead:

“Where will this investment lead to actual Gospel impact?”

That changes everything.

What Strategic Funding Could Look Like

  • Investing in churches that are actively reaching their communities
  • Supporting leadership teams that are intentionally discipling people
  • Funding partnership efforts that multiply impact
  • Providing grants for mergers, relaunches, or replanting efforts
  • Backing churches willing to try something different for the sake of the mission

This isn’t about favoritism. It’s about fruitfulness.

Look. Pouring resources into a model that isn’t producing disciples isn’t generosity. It’s poor stewardship.

At some point, we have to stop resourcing what was…and start investing in what could be or maybe better yet what should be!

6. Measure What Actually Matters (Not Just Attendance)

If we’re serious about stewardship, then we have to get serious about metrics. Because what we measure shapes what we value. And for too long, the primary metric has been simple:

“How many people showed up?”

Sure attendance matters. But it’s not the mission.

The Mission Is Clear

Jesus didn’t say: “Go and gather crowds.”

He said: “Go therefore and make disciples…” (Matthew 28:19, ESV)

That’s the target. So the question becomes: Are we measuring that?

When discipleship is happening, you should see a pattern:

  • Worship attendance grows →
  • Bible engagement deepens →
  • More people begin serving →
  • More people invite others and talk about Jesus →
  • New people come – and the cycle continues

If one grows but the others don’t, then something is off. And there’s a health issue that needs to be addressed.

Because discipleship isn’t a single metric. It’s a movement.

This is far from a “butts in seats” issue. It’s a discipleship issue. You can grow attendance and still be shallow. You can maintain membership and still be stagnant.

But when you make disciples? Everything else begins to move.

What Needs to Change

  • Track engagement, not just attendance
  • Measure serving and participation, not just presence
  • Celebrate life change, not just numbers
  • Ask regularly: Are we actually making disciples?

Because that’s the one thing Jesus explicitly told His Church to do. It’s about making disciples, not assembling crowds for an hour on a Sunday.

Let’s Wrap This Up

If we’re going to take stewardship seriously, then we have to align:

  • Our resources with mission
  • Our structures with reality
  • Our metrics with discipleship

This isn’t about tweaking the system. It’s about re-centering the mission.

And that’s going to take:

  • Broader thinking
  • Braver decisions
  • And a willingness to let go of what no longer serves the Gospel

Not because we don’t care about the Church, but because we care too much to lose what’s most important.

Stewardship Means Structure: 3 Moves We Can Make Right Now

April 29, 2026 / / 1 Comment

If we’re serious about moving from calling out the problem to actually changing the trajectory, then we need to get practical.

Not someday.
Not when things get worse.
Now.

In the last post, I outlined six pathways forward. Let’s take the first three and press into what they actually look like on the ground because if we don’t define them, they’ll stay ideas instead of action.

1. Deploy Real Transition Teams (Not Just Advice. Actual Help)

Right now, when a church starts to struggle, the “support system” often looks like this:

  • A meeting or two
  • Some general encouragement
  • Maybe a suggestion or two

And then… they’re largely on their own.

That’s not enough.

What a Transition Team Could Actually Look Like

Imagine instead a designated transition team that walks with a congregation for a defined season (6-18 months for starters). This team would be made up of:

  • A seasoned pastor with revitalization or merger experience
  • A trained lay leader (governance, finance, or organizational leadership)
  • A district representative who knows available resources and processes
  • A facilitator/coach who can lead hard conversations without emotional entanglement

This isn’t a task force that decides things. It’s a team that guides, clarifies, and moves the process forward.

What They Would Do

  • Conduct a real assessment of congregational health (not just attendance numbers)
  • Lead structured conversations with leadership and members
  • Lay out clear pathways: revitalization, partnership, merger, or closure
  • Help create a timeline with actual next steps
  • Keep the mission front and center when emotions run high

The Reality We’re Ignoring

We already have people who could do this. Within the district and synod structure, there are:

  • Circuit visitors
  • District presidents and vice presidents
  • Mission and ministry staff
  • Experienced pastors who have navigated these waters before

The issue isn’t a lack of people. It’s a lack of intentional deployment.

What if instead of waiting for churches to hit crisis mode these teams were proactively assigned when early warning signs appeared?

That’s not control. That’s care.

2. Normalize and Resource Church-to-Church Partnerships

This one is HUGE.

And honestly, it exposes something deeper in us. Because the resistance here isn’t logistical. It’s personal.

We like “our church.”
Our programs.
Our people.
Our traditions.

But the mission has never been about ours. Jesus even said he came to seek and to save the lost – disconnected – not here yet ones.

The Current Reality

In the same community, you’ll often find:

  • Multiple churches running under-resourced ministries
  • Multiple VBS programs competing for the same handful of kids
  • Multiple part-time staff stretched thin
  • Multiple congregations quietly declining separately

And we call that independence. But it’s often just inefficiency.

What Partnership Could Actually Look Like

  • Shared staffing
    • One pastor across multiple congregations
    • Shared Directors of Christian Education or Family Life
    • Joint outreach coordinators
  • Shared ministry efforts
    • One strong, community-wide VBS instead of five struggling ones
    • Combined youth groups
    • Joint outreach events that actually reach critical mass
  • Adoptive relationships
    • A healthier church helping lead and support a smaller one
    • Multi-site or campus models where it makes sense

Let’s Be Blunt

There is no Kingdom reason for five churches in one town to each run a half-effective ministry when together they could create something far stronger.

Sometimes our desire to “have our piece” of ministry is less about mission and more about control.

But if the Gospel is the goal, then collaboration isn’t optional. It’s essential.

What Needs to Change

We don’t just need permission for partnership.

We need active encouragement and resourcing:

  • Clear frameworks for how to share staff legally and financially
  • Templates for partnership agreements
  • Coaching for leaders navigating shared ministry
  • Stories that normalize this as wise, not desperate

Because right now, too many churches think partnership means failure. In reality, it might be the most faithful step forward.

3. Build a Best Practices Playbook for Hard Conversations

Look. I get it. Most churches don’t avoid hard decisions because they don’t care. They avoid them because they don’t know how to navigate them.

So they stall.
Or they argue.
Or they pretend things are fine.

The Questions We’re Avoiding

  • When is it time to seriously consider merging or even closing?
  • What does faithfulness look like in decline?
  • How do we honor the past without being held hostage by it?
  • Who actually gets to make these decisions and how?
  • What happens to the building, the money, the legacy?

These are heavy questions. And without guidance, they can feel overwhelming.

What a Playbook Could and Maybe Should Include

First, it is not a theological essay. It should be a practical, step-by-step guide:

1. Discernment Phase

  • Key indicators that change is necessary
  • Assessment tools (attendance across more than just worship, ministry engagement, financial health, community reach)
  • Questions every leadership team must wrestle with

2. Conversation Phase

  • How to structure congregational meetings
  • How to handle conflict and emotional responses
  • How to communicate clearly without causing panic

3. Decision Pathways

  • What revitalization actually requires
  • What partnership looks like in practice
  • What a healthy merger process entails
  • What faithful closure looks like (yes, that too)

4. Practical Logistics

  • Legal and constitutional considerations
  • Financial processes
  • Property decisions
  • Denominational procedures

5. Pastoral Care

  • Caring for members through grief and change
  • Honoring the legacy of a congregation
  • Keeping the Gospel central through every step

Why This Matters

Right now, every church feels like they’re reinventing the wheel. They don’t have to. We already have the experience. We already have the stories. We just haven’t organized them into something usable.

And until we do, churches will keep defaulting to inaction because inaction feels safer than the unknown.

Final Thought

None of this requires a theological shift. Our very theological identity and synodical polity actually allow and even was built for this! It just requires a structural and cultural shift.

  • Deploy people we already have
  • Work together instead of apart (anyone know what synod actually means)
  • Equip churches to face reality with clarity and courage

This is what stewardship looks like.

Not just naming the problem. But building pathways forward that churches can actually walk.

Next week, we’ll tackle the final three:

  • Activating synod and district resources more effectively
  • Funding strategy instead of survival
  • And telling better stories that redefine what success really looks like

I firmly believe we’re not done. Not even close!

A Few Weeks After Easter

April 28, 2026 / / 0 Comments

Grab that cup of coffee or whatever beverage suits you this time of day. I want to talk about something that doesn’t get said out loud very often in ministry circles, but probably should.

Before we dig in too deeply here this one is a shout out to my ministry friends. I’ve been there. I know the feeling. While my ministry now isn’t this way, it wasn’t too long ago that I had to listen to my own advice – which is why I’m sharing this with you today.

Easter Sunday is one of the best days of the year to be in ministry. Busy but the best kind of busy!

The room is full. Not just full, but full-full. Cars wrapping around the lot. Extra chairs in the aisles. Don’t tell the fire inspector. Familiar faces you haven’t seen in months sitting next to guests you’ve never met. The music is faster, a little louder, and the singing…wow the singing is on point. There’s this moment, usually somewhere in the opening hymn, where you can actually feel it. The room comes alive. It seems like everyone brought someone. Everyone is leaning in. And you’re standing up front thinking, now this is why I do this.

I’ve had those mornings. They’re real, and they’re genuinely good.

And then two or three weeks pass.

The lot has open spots again. The second row is half empty. The singing is…well, it’s fine. It’s your people. But it’s noticeably quieter than it was. The energy that felt almost electric three weeks ago has settled back into something more familiar, more ordinary. Normal.

Nobody warns you about the whiplash. This is not taught in any seminary class that I took.

I’m not talking about the numbers. I mean the feeling. The emotional and spiritual disorientation that comes from going, in the span of a few weeks, from the highest-energy Sunday of the year to what feels like the congregation just sort of… exhaled. Ministry leaders don’t always have language for it. It doesn’t feel like grief exactly, but it’s in that neighborhood. It doesn’t feel like discouragement exactly, but it can get there fast if you’re not careful.

Here’s what makes it harder: you can’t really talk about it. I mean seriously you can’t stand up on a Sunday in May and say “Hey, it felt way better in here three weeks ago.” You can’t let your team see you struggling with it because the room that’s in front of you is full of real people with real lives, and they need you present, not pining for a different version of the room. So you tuck it away. You preach as well as you can. You shake hands at the door. And somewhere underneath all of that, you’re quietly wrestling with something you can’t quite name.

I want to name it. Because I think a lot of ministry leaders carry this alone, and they don’t need to.

A few things that have helped me:

Remember what Easter actually measures. Easter attendance is a snapshot of curiosity and relationship, not a ceiling or a floor. The people who came because a family member invited them…that’s not nothing. That’s a door cracking open. The question isn’t why didn’t they come back, it’s what are we doing the other 51 Sundays that makes it worth coming back to? Easter doesn’t set the ceiling. It shows you what’s possible.

Name the thing to yourself. You don’t have to perform resilience. If the drop hits you then let it hit you, name it for what it is, and don’t spiritualize it into something it’s not. The emotional weight of caring deeply about a room full of people in need of the good news of Jesus is not a weakness. It’s actually evidence that you’re the right person for the job.

Anchor to the people in the room. One of the disciplines I keep coming back to is to stop looking at what’s missing and look at who’s there. There are people in your congregation on a random Sunday in May who are holding things together by a thread. They’re navigating rocky marriages, diagnoses, doubts and they showed up anyway. That room is not a consolation prize. It’s a gift.

Stay connected to your why, not your how many. The “how many” will fluctuate for your entire ministry. It always has. It always will. The leaders who make it to the long end of this work are almost always the ones who found something deeper than merely attendance metrics to stand on. Not because numbers don’t matter, because they do, but because numbers alone will eat you alive if you let them.

This one’s for the leaders who had a great Easter and then felt strangely quiet about it two weeks later. You’re not alone in that. And the ordinary Sunday in front of you? It matters more than it feels like it does right now. I think Mordecai’s words to Esther belong to all of us who get caught up in last week instead of loving the people in front of us this week. You were placed here for such a time as this.

He Meets You Where You Can Love Him

April 27, 2026 / / 2 Comments

There’s a moment in John 21 that most people miss, because our English Bibles smooth it out.

Jesus asks Peter three times, “Do you love me?” On the surface, it sounds repetitive. Maybe even a little harsh. Peter is standing by a charcoal fire. The same detail John deliberately includes to pull you back to that other fire, the one in the courtyard where Peter said three times, “I don’t know the man.”

Same smell. Similar setting. Different outcome.

But here’s what gets lost in translation.

The first two times, Jesus uses agape. This is the all-in, unconditional, lay-your-life-down kind of love. And both times, Peter answers with phileo. The love of friendship. Brotherly affection. “I care about you. I’m with you… but I’m not pretending I’m something I’m not.”

Peter can’t get to agape. Not after what he’s done. Not after how badly he’s failed.

He’s not posturing anymore. He’s not making bold promises. That version of Peter died in the courtyard. It died as he watched Jesus hanging on the cross.

So he tells the truth.

“I love you… but not like that.”

And then it happens.

The third time, Jesus changes the word.

He meets Peter where he is.

“Do you phileo me?” Do you love me like a friend?

That’s when it hits Peter. That’s when it breaks him. Not because Jesus asked three times, but because Jesus lowered the bar of the question to meet the reality of Peter’s heart.

Jesus didn’t demand a kind of love Peter couldn’t honestly give.

He met him in it.

And then, this is the part you don’t want to miss, Jesus commissions him anyway.

“Feed my lambs. Tend my sheep. Feed my sheep.”

The calling wasn’t based on the strength of Peter’s love.

It was based on the strength of Jesus’ grace.

That’s the story.

And it’s not just for Peter. For you.

Because a lot of us live like we’re disqualified until we can finally say we love Jesus the “right” way. Fully. Completely. No hesitation. No inconsistency.

But that’s not how this works.

If you can say, “Jesus, I love you with everything,” he says go.

If you can only say, “Jesus, I’m trying… I care… I’m not where I should be,” he still says go.

Because his love for you didn’t start with your response. And it doesn’t rise and fall based on your performance.

He meets you where you are.

Not to leave you there but to send you from there.

And somehow, that’s enough.

If It’s a Stewardship Crisis… Then Let’s Start Acting Like Stewards

April 22, 2026 / / 0 Comments

The response to my last post has been a little loud.

Some people were grateful.
Some were uncomfortable.
Some were frustrated.
Some flat did not like what I had to say.

And frankly all of those answers are good.

Because if we’re honest, we don’t need more agreement. We need movement.

So let’s move the conversation forward.

If this really is a stewardship crisis… then what do we actually do about it?

Not in theory. Not some vague encouragement.

But in real, tangible, actionable ways that help churches take faithful next steps.

First. Let’s Be Clear About What This Is Not

This is not about:

  • Forcing churches to close
  • Strong-arming congregations into mergers
  • Shaming smaller churches
  • Or acting like bigger automatically means better

That’s not the goal. The goal is faithfulness.

And faithfulness requires intentional stewardship of people, pastors, buildings, and the mission.

The Shift We Need

We have to move from:

Reactive → Intentional
Isolated → Supported
Preservation → Mission

Right now, too many congregations are left to figure this out alone. So they stall. Or they avoid hard conversations. Or they default to “just keep going.”

Not because they don’t care, but because they don’t know what else to do.

That’s where we need to change (or modify) the system.

What If We Actually Supported Churches Through This?

Not just with funding. Not just with prayers. Although we definitely need to be continually praying! But with real, hands-on, structured support.

I’m the kind of person who doesn’t just say there’s a problem and not offer a potential solution. So here’s a crack at what this could look like:

1. Deploy Real Transition Teams

Imagine if congregations didn’t have to navigate this alone.

Instead, trained teams made up of experienced pastors, lay leaders, and district support staff could step in to help churches. They would

  • Assess current health and mission alignment
  • Facilitate honest conversations (the ones no one wants to lead)
  • Walk leadership through options: revitalization, partnership, merger, or even closure
  • Keep the focus on Gospel impact not just institutional survival

This is not about outsiders dictating decisions. This is about guides helping congregations discern faithfully.

2. Normalize and Resource Church-to-Church Partnerships

Not every church needs to close. Let me say that very clearly so the people in the back don’t get their undies in a bunch.

Not every church needs to close!

But many shouldn’t stay isolated.

We should be actively encouraging:

  • Shared staffing models (one pastor or commissioned worker serving multiple congregations)
  • Ministry partnerships between neighboring churches
  • Campus-style expansions where one healthy church adopts another location
  • Leadership pipelines shared across congregations

We don’t need fewer churches. We need more connected churches.

3. Create a “Best Practices” Playbook for Hard Conversations

Right now, every church facing decline feels like they’re the first ones to ever go through it. News flash friends! They’re not.

So why aren’t we equipping them better?

We need a clear, accessible resource that walks congregations through:

  • How to recognize when change is necessary
  • How to lead a healthy congregational conversation
  • What a faithful merger process actually looks like
  • How to navigate closure with dignity, care, and Gospel clarity
  • Legal, financial, and property considerations
  • How to care for members emotionally and spiritually through transition

Not more theory. Real steps. Real timelines. Real examples.

4. Activate Existing Synod and District Resources

We don’t necessarily need to build something new. We need to better deploy what we already have.

There are leaders at the district and synod levels with wisdom, experience, and capacity. But too often, their role is reactive instead of proactive. They are spending far too much time behind desks when they could be sitting with pastors and church leaders. They could be listening. Encouraging and connecting right there in the communities that are struggling.

What if:

  • Every struggling congregation had a clear, accessible pathway to support
  • District leaders regularly initiated conversations instead of waiting for crisis
  • Resources were streamlined and digitized instead of scattered and still in binders in some basement
  • Churches knew exactly who to call and what help would actually look like

Support shouldn’t feel distant or bureaucratic.

It should feel present, personal, and practical.

5. Fund Strategy, Not Just Survival

Money isn’t the primary issue, but how we use it matters.

Instead of defaulting to, “Let’s help them stay open a little longer…”

What if we prioritized:

  • Funding for transition teams
  • Grants for merger or relaunch processes
  • Support for leadership coaching during major change
  • Investment in church plants or revitalization efforts tied to legacy churches

Not bailout money. Mission-focused investment.

6. Tell Better Stories

Right now, closures and mergers feel like failure. So churches avoid them.

But what if we told different stories? Stories of:

  • Two churches coming together and reaching more people than either could alone
  • A legacy congregation blessing a new church plant in their community
  • A faithful closure that led to Kingdom impact beyond what anyone expected

We need to redefine what success looks like. Because the Gospel isn’t measured in how long something stays open.

It’s measured in lives reached.

This Is About Courage Together

No single church should have to carry this weight alone. And no congregation should feel like their only options are: “Stay the same” or “shut down.”

There is a better way. But this better way requires:

  • Courage from congregational leaders
  • Initiative from district leadership
  • Collaboration across local congregations
  • And a shared commitment to the mission over the model

Final Thought

If we really believe the Church exists to reach people with the Gospel, then we have to be willing to structure ourselves around that mission.

Not around comfort.
Not around history.
Not around buildings.

Around people who don’t yet know Jesus.

We don’t need to panic.

We don’t need to force outcomes.

But we do need to act like stewards.

Because the mission is too important not to.

Next week, I want to take a deeper dive into a few of these pathways. We’ll look at what they actually look like on the ground, and how churches can begin taking first steps.

« Older posts

© 2026 derrickhurst.org

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑